Al Qaeda Discusses Losing Iraq

More proof of the victory in Iraq, so the Media continues to find ways to ignore it and find bad news else where. Why? Isn't it great that the Battle for Iraq is almost over?

Is good news so hard to print? I know that I love to print good news! I even mock bad news! Why do the professionals find it so hard? If not impossible.

Information Warfare: Al Qaeda Discusses Losing Iraq: "Al Qaeda Discusses Losing Iraq
May 27, 2008: Al Qaeda web sites are making a lot of noise about 'why we lost in Iraq.' Western intelligence agencies are fascinated by the statistics being posted in several of these Arab language sites. Not the kind of stuff you read about in the Western media. According to al Qaeda, their collapse in Iraq was steep and catastrophic. According to their stats, in late 2006, al Qaeda was responsible for 60 percent of the terrorist attacks, and nearly all the ones that involved killing a lot of civilians. The rest of the violence was carried out by Iraqi Sunni Arab groups, who were trying in vain to scare the Americans out of the country.

Today, al Qaeda has been shattered, with most of its leadership and foot soldiers dead, captured or moved from Iraq. As a result, al Qaeda attacks have declined more than 90 percent. Worse, most of their Iraqi Sunni Arab allies have turned on them, or simply quit. This 'betrayal' is handled carefully on the terrorist web sites, for it is seen as both shameful, and perhaps recoverable."